One-year outcomes of resveratrol supplement with aflibercept versus aflibercept monotherapy in wet age-related macular degeneration
Not reported | Not specified | Datseris I et al. (2023)
Datseris I, Bouratzis N, Kotronis C, Datseris I, Tzanidaki ME, Rouvas A, Gouliopoulos N. One-year outcomes of resveratrol supplement with aflibercept versus aflibercept monotherapy in wet age-related macular degeneration. Int J Ophthalmol, 2023; 16(9):1496-1502.
Locations

Conducted in Greece
Study Period

Not specified (the protocol was approved in January 2021)
Study Design

Prospective, randomized, monocentric, comparative study
Study Population

Experimental Group
Control Group
Follow-up Time: 12 months
Outcomes

Durability
Number of Injections Number of aflibercept injections over 12 months:
• Resveratrol + aflibercept: 4.28 ± 0.90
• Aflibercept alone: 4.52 ± 1.00
• Difference: p=0.38.
Vision
Best-Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA)
The mean change in BCVA from baseline at Month 12 (Primary Outcome):
• Resveratrol + aflibercept: 0.42 ± 0.23 logMAR
• Aflibercept alone: 0.53 ± 0.30 logMAR
• Difference: p= 0.12
Contrast Sensitivity
Contrast sensitivity at 12 months:
• Resveratrol + aflibercept: 1.21 ± 0.37
• Aflibercept alone: 1.04 ± 0.52
• Difference: p= 0.19
Other
Quality of Life (QoL) Depression HADS Depression score at 12 months:
• Resveratrol + aflibercept: 8.28 ± 1.54
• Aflibercept alone: 11.88 ± 2.51
• Difference: p <0.001.
Anxiety HADS Anxiety score at 12 months:
• Resveratrol + aflibercept: 7.76 ± 1.51
• Aflibercept alone: 11.92 ± 2.52
• Difference: p<0.001
Immunognicity
Not reported
Pharmokinetics
Not reported
Anatomic
Safety
Treatment-emergent AEs No significant safety concerns reported.
Ocular-related AEs None reported.
Non-ocular AEs None reported.

Conclusion
The addition of resveratrol (Resvega®) to aflibercept therapy improved contrast sensitivity and reduced depression and anxiety symptoms but did not significantly impact BCVA or the number of injections required over 12 months.
Risk of Bias Assessment for Primary Outcome
Randomization Process
Some concerns
Note: No information on randomization method or allocation concealment. However, the two groups were comparable at the baseline.
Missing Outcome Data
Low risk
Note: No patients withdrew.
Selection of the Reported Results
Some concerns Note: the protocol is not publicly available.
Deviations from Intended Observations
Some concerns Note: No information on whether deviations arose because of the trial context. No missingness for all patients. The ITT principle was applied for the data analysis.
Measurement of the Outcome
Some concerns Note: This is a single-center study. However, there is no information on the method of assessor masking.
Overall
High risk
Categories: Wet AMD
