Yishen Yanggan Mingmu formula combined with anti-vascular endothelial growth factor drugs for the treatment of wet age-related macular degeneration
Not reported | Not specified | Gao J et al. (2023)
Gao J, Li M, Wang YY, Liao YH, Gong Y. Yishen Yanggan Mingmu formula combined with anti-vascular endothelial growth factor drugs for the treatment of wet age-related macular degeneration. Int J Ophthalmol, 2023; 23(8):1362-1366.
Locations

China
Study Period

September 2020 – November 2022
Study Design

Randomized, controlled, parallel-group clinical trial
Study Population

Experimental Group
Control Group
Follow-up Time: 3 months
Outcomes

Durability
Not reported
Vision
Best-Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) The mean change in BCVA from baseline to Month 3 (Primary Outcome):
• Injection group: -0.23 ± 0.30 logMAR
• Combination group: -0.32 ± 0.37 logMAR
• Difference: p= 0.331
Other
Total Effective Rate
The total effective rate at Month 3:
• Injection group: 66% (19/29)
• Combination group: 76% (22/29)
• Difference: p= 0.282
Others
• After 3 months of treatment, each kind of traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) syndrome in the combination group was significantly improved compared with those syndromes before the treatment (p<0.001).
• After the treatment, the scores of dizziness and insomnia, soreness and weakness of the waist and knees, paleness and cold limbs, dry eyes, and fatigue in the combination group were significantly lower than the injection group (p<0.001).
Immunognicity
Not reported
Pharmokinetics
Not reported
Anatomic
Central Macular Thickness (CMT) The mean change in CMT from baseline to Month 3:
• Injection group: -95.36 ± 56.81 µm
• Combination group: -155.93 ± 143.79 µm
• Difference: p= 0.042.
Safety
Treatment-emergent AEs No significant safety concerns were reported.
Ocular-related AEs None reported.
Non-ocular AEs None reported.

Conclusion
The addition of Yishen Yanggan Mingmu formula to conbercept therapy resulted in greater improvement in CMT and overall treatment efficacy, but did not significantly impact BCVA at 3 months. Further research is needed to confirm long-term benefits.
Risk of Bias Assessment for Primary Outcome
Randomization Process
Some concerns
Note: No information on the method of randomization or allocation concealment. However, the two groups were comparable at the baseline.
Missing Outcome Data
Low risk
Note: No missingness was reported. The analysis was based on all included patients.
Selection of the Reported Results
Some Concerns Note: The protocol is not publicly available.
Deviations from Intended Observations
Some concerns Note: This is an open-label study. No information on whether deviations arose because of the trial context. The analysis is based on all included patients.
Measurement of the Outcome
Low risk Note: This is an open-label study. However, the primary outcome assessment was unlikely to have been influenced by knowledge of intervention.
Overall
High risk
Categories: Wet AMD
