Impact of Baseline Characteristics on Geographic Atrophy Progression in the FILLY Trial Evaluating the Complement C3 Inhibitor Pegcetacoplan
NCT02503332 | FILLY | Steinle NC et al. (2021)
Steinle, N. C., Pearce, I., Monés, J., Metlapally, R., Saroj, N., Hamdani, M., Ribeiro, R., Rosenfeld, P. J., & Lad, E. M. Impact of Baseline Characteristics on Geographic Atrophy Progression in the FILLY Trial Evaluating the Complement C3 Inhibitor Pegcetacoplan. Am J Ophthalmol, 2021; 227:116–124.
Locations

Multicenter international study
Study Period

Not reported
Study Design

Post hoc analysis of a Phase 2, multicenter, randomized, single-masked, sham-controlled trial
Study Population

Experimental Group
Control Group
Follow-up Time: 12 months
Outcomes

Durability
Not reported
Vision
Not reported
Other
Efficacy: Progression Outcomes
Geographic Atrophy (GA)
Overall mean change in GA lesion size from baseline to Month 12:
• Pegcetacoplan Monthly = 0.26 mm (SD 0.17)
• Pegcetacoplan EOM = 0.27 mm (SD 0.26)
• Sham = 0.36 mm (SD 0.21)
Compared to sham:
• Monthly dosing (p <0.05)
• EOM dosing (p <0.05).
Risk Factors for GA Progression (multiple variate analysis)
• Patients with extrafoveal GA lesions showed significantly higher lesion growth compared to foveal lesions (p =0.001)
• Larger low-luminance deficit (LLD) at baseline was associated with increased GA lesion growth (p = 0.023)
• Pegcetacoplan treatment significantly reduced GA progression in all subgroups, even when accounting for these risk factors.
Immunognicity
Not reported
Pharmokinetics
Not reported
Anatomic
Not reported
Safety
Not reported

Conclusion
Pegcetacoplan significantly reduced GA progression at both monthly and EOM doses over 12 months, even after adjusting for baseline risk factors.
Risk of Bias Assessment for Primary Outcome
Randomization Process
Some concerns
Note: “Randomization was performed using a web-based system, and the randomization schedule was blocked to ensure balanced treatment allocations within sites.”
However, as this is a post hoc analysis, the patients without needed information were excluded from the final analysis.
Missing Outcome Data
Low risk
Note: This is a post hoc analysis, the patients without needed information were excluded from the final analysis. Therefore, the missingness did not depend on the true value.
Selection of the Reported Results
Low risk Note: have registration with protocol.
Deviations from Intended Observations
Low risk Note: This is a double-masked study. mITT was applied to the primary outcome analysis.
Measurement of the Outcome
Low risk Note: This is double masked study. In addition, *“…Images were assessed by the central reading center.”
Overall
Some concerns
Categories: Dry AMD Geographic Atrophy
