Effect of 2-year nutritional supplementation on progression of age-related macular degeneration
Not reported | GOAL in AMD Trial | Piatti A et al. (2020)
Piatti A, Croce A, Mazzacane D, et al. Effect of 2-year nutritional supplementation on progression of age-related macular degeneration. Eur J Ophthalmol, 2020; 30(2):376-381.
Locations

8 ophthalmology centers across Italy
Study Period

Not reported
Study Design

Multicenter, double-masked, placebo-controlled, randomized study
Study Population

Experimental Group
Control Group
Follow-up Time: 24 months
Outcomes

Durability
Not reported
Vision
Best-Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) Mean change in BCVA (ETDRS letters) at 24 months:
• Supplement: Stable in 85.4%
• Placebo: Stable in 80.8%
• Difference: p = 0.74 Near VA Mean change in near VA (MNREAD chart) at 24 months:
• Supplement: Stable in 83.3%
• Placebo: Stable in 65.4%
• Difference: p = 0.08 Vision Maintaining The proportion of patients with worsening in all three measures (retinography, distance VA, and near VA):
• Supplement: 0%
• Placebo: 11.5%
• Difference: p = 0.04
Other
Efficacy: Progression outcomes AMD Progression AMD progression at 24 months (primary outcome):
• Supplement: 2.1% (1/48)
• Placebo: 15.4% (4/26)
• Difference: p = 0.049
Immunognicity
Not reported
Pharmokinetics
Not reported
Anatomic
Not reported
Safety
During the entire study, no significant adverse events were recorded.

Conclusion
Nutritional supplementation with carotenoids, antioxidants, and omega-3 fatty acids significantly reduced the risk of AMD progression over 2 years compared to placebo. No safety concerns were noted.
Risk of Bias Assessment for Primary Outcome
Randomization Process
Some concerns
Note: No information on the randomization and concealment method. However, the baseline is balanced between the two groups.
Missing Outcome Data
High risk
Note: A total of 6 patients (6/80, 7.5%) were excluded from the final analysis due to deviations from the protocol. The number of participants who were excluded from the analysis may have a substantial impact on the result.
Selection of the Reported Results
Some concerns Note: the protocol is not publicly available
Deviations from Intended Observations
Low risk Note: This is a double-masked study. mITT principle was applied
Measurement of the Outcome
Low risk Note: This is a double-masked study. “An independent reading center judged all the photographs taken during the clinical trial.”
Overall
High risk
Categories: Dry AMD
