Intravitreal aflibercept 8 mg in neovascular age-related macular degeneration (PULSAR): 48-week results from a randomised, double-masked, non-inferiority, phase 3 trial

NCT04423718  |  PULSAR  |  Lanzetta P et al. (2024)

Lanzetta, P., Korobelnik, J-F., Heier, J. S., Leal, S., Holz, F. G., Clark, W. L., et al. Intravitreal aflibercept 8 mg in neovascular age-related macular degeneration (PULSAR): 48-week results from a randomised, double-masked, non-inferiority, phase 3 trial. The Lancet, 2024; 403(10344):1141-1152.

Locations

Locations

223 sites across 27 countries worldwide

Study Period

Study Period

August 2020 – July 2021 (48-week results)

Study Design

Study Design

Phase 3, multicenter, randomized, double-masked, non-inferiority trial

Study Population

Study Population

Characteristic:
Type of AMD:
2 (Wet AMD)
AMD Stage:
3 (Late)
Total Sample Size:
1011 randomized (Aflibercept 8q12: 336, Aflibercept 8q16: 338, Aflibercept 2q8: 337)
Age:
Phase 3, multicenter, randomized, double-masked, non-inferiority trial
Sex (Male) n%:
459 (45.5%)

Experimental Group

Intervention Therapy:
Aflibercept 8 mg (8q12 and 8q16)
Dose & Frequency:
8 mg every 12 weeks (8q12) or every 16 weeks (8q16) following three initial monthly doses
Age (Years):
• Aflibercept 8q12: 74.7±7.9 • Aflibercept 8q16 :74.5±8.5
Number of Patients:
674 (8q12: 336, 8q16: 338)
Male N %:
311 (46.2%)
Patients Followed Up:
628

Control Group

Intervention Therapy:
Aflibercept 2 mg (2q8)
Dose & Frequency:
2 mg every 8 weeks following three initial monthly doses
Age (Years):
74.2 ± 8.8
Number of Patients:
337
Male N %:
148 (44.0%)
Patients Followed Up:
309

Follow-up Time:  48 weeks

Outcomes

Outcomes

Durability


• A total of 251 (79%) of 316 patients in the aflibercept 8q12 group and 239 (77%) of 312 patients in the aflibercept 8q16 group maintained their assigned dosing regimen up to week 48.
• Overall, 523 (83%) of 628 patients who received aflibercept 8 mg maintained at least 12-week dosing intervals up to week 48.

Vision

Best-Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA)
Mean BCVA change at 48 weeks (Primary Outcome):
• 8q12 = +6.7 ± 12.6 letters
• 8q16 = +6.2 ± 11.7 letters
• 2q8 = +7.6 ± 12.2 letters
• Differences: 8q12 vs 2q8 = -0.97 letters (95% CI: -2.87 to 0.92, p=0.0009)
• Difference: 8q16 vs 2q8 = -1.14 letters (95% CI: -2.97 to 0.69, p=0.0011).

Other

N/A

Immunognicity

Not reported

Pharmokinetics

Not reported

Anatomic

Change in Central Retinal Thickness (CRT)
Mean CRT reduction at 48 weeks:
• 8q12 = -147.4 µm (95% CI: -155.2 to -139.5, p=0.012)
• 8q16 = -146.8 µm (95% CI: -154.2 to -139.4, p=0.014)
• 2q8 = -136.3 µm (95% CI: -144.6 to -127.9, p=0.031).
Choroidal neovascularisation (CNV)
At week 48, least squares mean change of CNV:
• 8q12 = -3.7 (SE 0.3) mm²
• 8q16 = -2.9 (0.3) mm²
• 2q8 = -2.4 (0.3) mm²
The least squares mean change in total lesion area at week 48:
• 8q12 = -0.46 (SE 0.19) mm²
• 8q16 = -0.35 (0.20) mm²
• 2q8 = 0.09 (0.22) mm²
Proportion of Patients with No Retinal Fluid
At Week 16
• 8q12 = 62%
• 8q16 = 65%
• 2q8 = 52%
• Difference: Pooled 8 mg vs. 2q8 = 12% (95% CI: 5% to 18%, p=0.0002).

Safety

Ocular Treatment-emergent AEs (TEAEs) Any:
• 8q12: 129 (39%)
• 8q16: 127 (38%)
• 2q8: 130 (39%)
Intraocular inflammation in the study eye:
• 8q12: 4 cases
• 8q16: 1 cases
• 2q8: 2 cases

Non-ocular TEAEs
Any:
• 8q12: 175 (52%)
• 8q16: 182 (54%)
• 2q8: 178 (53%)
Any adjudicated treatment-emergent Anti-Platelet Trialists’ Collaboration events:
• 8q12: 1 case
• 8q16: 2 cases
• 2q8: 5 cases
Hypertension:
• 8q12: 16 (5%)
• 8q16: 16 (5%)
• 2q8: 12 (4%))

Serious TEAEs
Ocular
• 8q12: 6 (2%)
• 8q16: 5 (1%)
• 2q8: 2 (1%)
Non-Ocular:
• 8q12: 34 (10%)
• 8q16: 32 (9%)
• 2q8: 46 (14%)

Deaths
• 8q12: 3 (1%)
• 8q16: 1 (<1%)
• 2q8: 5 (1%).

Outcomes

Conclusion

Aflibercept 8 mg administered every 12 or 16 weeks was non-inferior to aflibercept 2 mg every 8 weeks in terms of BCVA improvement, with superior anatomic outcomes and a similar safety profile, potentially reducing treatment burden for nAMD patients.

Risk of Bias Assessment for Primary Outcome

Randomization Process
Low Risk

Low risk

Note: “Eligible patients were randomly assigned, using an interactive web response system…” There is no information that suggestion of the baseline characteristics unbalanced.

Missing Outcome Data
Low Risk

Low risk

Note: “Sensitivity and supplementary analyses were performed including multiple imputation and tipping point analyses to assess the effect of potential deviations from the missing at random assumption.”

Selection of the Reported Results
Low Risk

Low risk Note: Registration with the protocol.

Deviations from Intended Observations
Low Risk

Low risk Note: “Patients, all study personnel (other than those performing unmasked roles), and the central reading centre were masked to treatment assignment.” “All efficacy analyses were conducted in the full analysis set (all randomised patients who received at least one dose of the study treatment) according to original randomisation…”

Measurement of the Outcome
Low Risk

Low risk Note: “Patients, all study personnel (other than those performing unmasked roles), and the central reading centre were masked to treatment assignment.” “The same certified BCVA examiner performed assessments for each patient, whenever possible, to ensure consistent measurement.”

Overall
Low Risk

Low risk

Categories: Wet AMD