Intravitreal sirolimus with adjunct aflibercept versus aflibercept monotherapy for persistent, exudative age-related macular degeneration

NCT02732899  |  Not specified  |  Rowe LW et al. (2023)

Rowe LW, Minturn RJ, Burgett LA, Bracha P, Maturi RK. Intravitreal sirolimus with adjunct aflibercept versus aflibercept monotherapy for persistent, exudative age-related macular degeneration: a pilot study. Int J Retina Vitreous, 2023; 9:1.

Locations

Locations

Conducted in the United States

Study Period

Study Period

April 12, 2016 – March 20, 2017

Study Design

Study Design

Phase 2, single-center, randomized, subject-masked, controlled trial

Study Population

Study Population

Characteristic:
Type of AMD:
2 (Wet AMD)
AMD Stage:
3 (Late)
Total Sample Size:
20 patients (20 eyes)
Age:
Phase 2, single-center, randomized, subject-masked, controlled trial
Sex (Male) n%:
Not explicitly reported

Experimental Group

Intervention Therapy:
Intravitreal sirolimus 440 µg + adjunct aflibercept 2 mg
Dose & Frequency:
Sirolimus every 8 weeks, alternating with aflibercept every 8 weeks (one month apart)
Age (Years):
80.8 ± 7.2
Number of Patients:
10 randomized and treated
Male N %:
Not explicitly reported
Patients Followed Up:
10

Control Group

Intervention Therapy:
Intravitreal aflibercept 2 mg monotherapy
Dose & Frequency:
Aflibercept every 8 weeks, alternating with sham injection for masking
Age (Years):
78.4 ± 9.7
Number of Patients:
10 randomized and treated
Male N %:
Not explicitly reported
Patients Followed Up:
10

Follow-up Time:  36 weeks

Outcomes

Outcomes

Durability

Not reported

Vision

Best-Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) The mean change in BCVA change (ETDRS letters) from baseline to Week 36:
• Sirolimus + aflibercept: +2.5 (95% CI : -0.7 to 5.7)
• Aflibercept: +0.8 (95% CI : -1.3 to 2.9)
• Difference : p=0.42

Other

N/A

Immunognicity

Not reported

Pharmokinetics

Not reported

Anatomic

Central Subfield Thickness (CST)
Mean change in CST from baseline to Week 36 (Primary Outcome):
• Sirolimus + aflibercept: -54.0 µm (95% CI : -106.7 to -1.4)
• Aflibercept: -0.1 µm (95% CI : -73.1 to 72.9])
• Difference : p= 0.28

The percentage decrease in mean CST :
• Sirolimus + aflibercept: 12%
• Aflibercept: 2.5%
• Difference : p= 0.30

Retinal Fluid
Mean change in subretinal fluid (SRF) from baseline to Week 36:
• Sirolimus + aflibercept: -9.32 mm³
• Aflibercept: -3.02 mm³
• Difference: p= 0.54.

The mean change in intraretinal fluid (IRF) from baseline to Week 36:
• Sirolimus + aflibercept: -0.43 mm³
• Aflibercept: -0.99 mm³
• Difference: p=0.60

Proportion of eyes with complete resolution of SRF from baseline to Week 36:
• Sirolimus + aflibercept: 22.2%
• Aflibercept: 30.0%.

Proportion of eyes with complete resolution of IRF from baseline to Week 36:
• Sirolimus + aflibercept: 67.0%
• Aflibercept: 33.0%

Safety

Minor ocular AEs
• Sirolimus + aflibercept: 4 events
• Aflibercept: 2 events.
Minor systemic AEs
• Sirolimus + aflibercept: 4 AEs
• Aflibercept: 2 AEs.

Serious ocular AEs
None reported in either group.
Serious systemic AEs
• Sirolimus + aflibercept: 3 events (pancreatitis, pneumonia, worsening hypertension)
• Aflibercept: 0 events.

Outcomes

Conclusion

Intravitreal sirolimus with adjunct aflibercept showed anatomical benefits, including greater CST reduction and improved IRF/SRF resolution. However, these improvements were not statistically significant, and there were more systemic adverse events in the sirolimus group. Further studies are needed to clarify the benefit-risk profile.

Risk of Bias Assessment for Primary Outcome

Randomization Process
Concern Alert

Some concerns

Note: No information on the randomization method. However, the two groups were comparable at the baseline.

Missing Outcome Data
Low Risk

Low risk

Note: The only missed visit by a subject occurred at week 32 in the control group and was deemed to be non-related to the subject’s ocular disease or treatment.

Selection of the Reported Results
Low Risk

Low risk Registration with the protocol.

Deviations from Intended Observations
Low Risk

Low risk Note: The assessors and the patients wee masked to the study treatment. “No subjects in the control group met deferral of treatment criteria at any point during this trial.” All 20 patients were included to the final assessment. (ITT principle)

Measurement of the Outcome
Low Risk

Low risk Note: this is a single site study. “The same Heidelberg Spectralis machine was used to obtain both images and CST. Prior to data analysis, the automated CST segmentation was verifed and manually adjusted in an anonymized manner, as necessary.”

Overall
Concern Alert

Some concerns

Categories: Wet AMD