Characterizing New-Onset Exudation in the Randomized Phase 2 FILLY Trial of Complement Inhibitor Pegcetacoplan for Geographic Atrophy

NCT02503332  |  FILLY  |  Wykoff et al. (2021)

Wykoff, C. C., Rosenfeld, P. J., Waheed, N. K., Singh, R. P., Ronca, N., Slakter, J. S., Staurenghi, G., Monés, J., Baumal, C. R., Saroj, N., Metlapally, R., Ribeiro, R. Characterizing New-Onset Exudation in the Randomized Phase 2 FILLY Trial of Complement Inhibitor Pegcetacoplan for Geographic Atrophy. Ophthalmology, 2021; 128:1325-1336.

Locations

Locations

46 sites across the United States, Australia, and New Zealand

Study Period

Study Period

Not reported

Study Design

Study Design

Post hoc analysis of a phase 2, prospective, randomized, single-masked, sham-controlled trial

Study Population

Study Population

Characteristic:
Type of AMD:
1 (Dry AMD)
AMD Stage:
3 (Late)
Total Sample Size:
246 randomized
Age:
Post hoc analysis of a phase 2, prospective, randomized, single-masked, sham-controlled trial
Sex (Male) n%:
Not reported

Experimental Group

Intervention Therapy:
Pegcetacoplan 15 mg
Dose & Frequency:
Intravitreal injection monthly or every other month (EOM) for 12 months
Age (Years):
• Monthly=79.6±7.51• EOM=80.9±7.55
Number of Patients:
• Monthly = 86• EOM = 79
Male N %:
• Monthly=31 (36.0%)• EOM=29 (36.7%)

Control Group

Intervention Therapy:
Sham injection
Dose & Frequency:
Monthly or EOM for 12 months
Age (Years):
78.4±7.43
Number of Patients:
81
Male N %:
32 (39.5%)

Follow-up Time:  18 months

Outcomes

Outcomes

Durability

Not reported

Vision

Best-Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) BCVA change at eAMD diagnosis:
• Mean = -2.3 lettersBCVA change from baseline to Month 18:
• eAMD eyes = -11 letters
• non-eAMD eyes = -6 letters.

Other

Efficacy: Progression OutcomesExudative AMD (eAMD) New-Onset eAMD incidence over 18 months (Primary Outcome):
• Pegcetacoplan Monthly = 20.9% (18/86)
• Pegcetacoplan EOM = 8.9% (7/79)
• Sham = 1.2% (1/81)Mean time to eAMD diagnosis = 256 days (range: 31-555 days) for all three groups.Baseline history of eAMD in the fellow eye (risk factor of the new onset eAMD in the study eye):
• Patients with new development of eAMD = 69% (18/26)
• Patients without new development of eAMD = 35% (76/217)
• p = 0.0007Double-layer sign (DLS) in the study eye (risk factor of the new onset eAMD in the study eye):
• Patients with new development of eAMD = 73.1% (19/26)
• Patients without new development of eAMD = 32.5% (70/215)
• p < 0.0001

Immunognicity

Not reported

Pharmokinetics

Not reported

Anatomic

Macular Neovascularization (MNV) Fluorescein Angiography (FA) Findings:
• FA confirmed MNV in 10/17 eyes (59%) at eAMD diagnosis, all classified as occult lesions.
• No FA evidence of MNV in 7/17 eyesOthers For patients with new eAMD:
• Mean increase in central retinal thickness (CRT) = 60 µm
• Cystoid spaces detected in 76% of affected eyes
• Subretinal fluid detected in 62% of affected eyes

Safety

Not specifically reported for this post hoc analysis.

Outcomes

Conclusion

Pegcetacoplan treatment slowed GA progression but was associated with an increased incidence of investigator-determined exudative AMD. The presence of fellow-eye eAMD and baseline double-layer sign were significant risk factors. The safety profile was acceptable, supporting the continuation of phase 3 trials.

Risk of Bias Assessment for Primary Outcome

Randomization Process
Low Risk

Low risk
Note: *“Randomization was performed using a web-based system, and the randomization schedule was blocked to ensure balanced treatment allocations within sites.” *“The pegcetacoplan and sham groups were comparable with regard to baseline demographic and ocular characteristics”

Missing Outcome Data
Low Risk

Low risk
Note: This is a post hoc analysis, the patients without needed information were excluded from the final analysis. Therefore, the missingness did not depend on the true value.

Selection of the Reported Results
Low Risk

Low risk Note: have registration with protocol.

Deviations from Intended Observations
Low Risk

Low risk Note: This is a double-masked study. mITT was applied to the primary outcome analysis.

Measurement of the Outcome
Low Risk

Low risk Note: This is double masked study. In addition, *“…Images were assessed by the central reading center.”

Overall
Low Risk

Low risk

Categories: Dry AMD Geographic Atrophy