LIGHTSITE III: 13-Month Efficacy and Safety Evaluation of Multiwavelength Photobiomodulation in Nonexudative (Dry) Age-Related Macular Degeneration Using the Lumithera Valeda Light Delivery System

NCT04065490  |  LIGHTSITE III  |  Boyer D et al. (2024)

Boyer, D., Hu, A., Warrow, D., Xavier, S., Gonzalez, V., Lad, E., Rosen, R. B., Do, D., Schneiderman, T., Ho, A., Munk, M. R., Jaffe, G., Tedford, S. E., Croissant, C. L., Walker, M., Rückert, R., Tedford, C. LIGHTSITE III: 13-Month Efficacy and Safety Evaluation of Multiwavelength Photobiomodulation in Nonexudative (Dry) Age-Related Macular Degeneration Using the Lumithera Valeda Light Delivery System. Retina, 2024; 44:487–497.

Locations

Locations

10 centers in the United States

Study Period

Study Period

Not reported

Study Design

Study Design

Randomized, double-masked, sham-controlled trial

Study Population

Study Population

Characteristic:
Type of AMD:
1 (Dry AMD)
AMD Stage:
• A total of 20.0% (n = 29) of subjects were categorized as early-stage AMD • 72.0% (n = 105) were intermediate-stage AMD • 8.0% (n = 11) were late-stage AMD (GA, no CNV).
Total Sample Size:
100 subjects (148 eyes) randomized (PBM: 91 eyes, Sham: 54 eyes)
Age:
Randomized, double-masked, sham-controlled trial
Sex (Male) n%:
32 (32.0%)

Experimental Group

Intervention Therapy:
Multiwavelength Photobiomodulation (PBM) using the Valeda Light Delivery System
Dose & Frequency:
Nine sessions over 3-5 weeks, repeated every 4 months for 24 months
Age (Years):
74.4 ± 7.3
Number of Patients:
65 (91 eyes)
Male N %:
19 (29.2%)
Patients Followed Up:
56

Control Group

Intervention Therapy:
Sham PBM (Low fluence light exposure)
Dose & Frequency:
Sham exposure mimicking active PBM treatment
Age (Years):
77.1 ± 6.2
Number of Patients:
35 (54 eyes)
Male N %:
13 (37.1%)
Patients Followed Up:
27

Follow-up Time:  13 months

Outcomes

Outcomes

Durability

Not reported

Vision

Best-Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA)
Mean BCVA change at 13 months (Primary Outcome):
• PBM = +5.4 ± 9.2 letters
• Sham = +3.0 ± 8.3 letters
• Difference = +2.4 letters (95% CI: 0.1 to 4.7, p = 0.02).

Proportion of Eyes Gaining ≥5 Letters
At 13 months:
• PBM: 54.9%
• Sham: 40.7%
• Difference = +14.2% (95% CI: 2.5 to 25.9, p = 0.018).

Proportion of Eyes Gaining ≥10 Letters
At 13 months:
• PBM: 25.8%
• Sham: 15.1%
• Difference = +10.7% (95% CI: 1.9 to 19.5, p = 0.021).

Proportion of Eyes Gaining ≥15 Letters
At 13 months:
• PBM: 4.4%
• Sham: 1.9%
• Difference = +2.5% (95% CI: -1.2 to 6.2, p = 0.19).

Other

Efficacy: Progression
New-Onset Geographic Atrophy At 13 months
• PBM: 1.1%
• Sham: 10.0%
• Difference = -8.9% (95% CI: -16.1 to -1.7, p = 0.024, odds ratio: 9.4).
Others
At 13 months:
• A total of one Sham eye (1.8%), five PBM-treated eyes (5.4%), and three nonstudy eyes (8.3%) converted to nAMD
• A numerical trend showed an increase in GA lesion area in Sham (1.48, SE 0.94; SD 1.62) compared with PBM-treated eyes (1.16, SE 0.66; SD 1.32, p = 0.75)

Immunognicity

Not reported

Pharmokinetics

Not reported

Anatomic

Drusen Volume
• No change in subRPE macular drusen volume was seen in PBMtreated eyes (0.006 mm3); however, an increase was seen in the Sham group (0.049 mm3).
• At Month 13, a statistically significant correlation was observed for measured macular drusen volume in PBM-treated eyes.
• Subjects with higher BCVA scores showed lower values for macular drusen volume in the PBM group (p =0.004).

Safety

Device-related AEs
• Only one ocular-specific SAE was reported and was not considered related to the treatment
• Four ocular-specific AEs were considered related to the treatment
Ocular AEs
Study eyes:
• PBM: 21/93, 22.6%
• Sham: 21/55, 21.8%

Outcomes

Conclusion

LIGHTSITE III demonstrated a significant improvement in BCVA and reduced risk of new-onset GA with PBM treatment in intermediate AMD. PBM was well-tolerated with a favorable safety profile.

Risk of Bias Assessment for Primary Outcome

Randomization Process
High Risk

High risk

Note: No information on how to perform the randomization and allocation concealment. In addition, the basic characteristics of the two groups looks not balanced for some variables (Table 1).

Missing Outcome Data
Low Risk

Low risk

Note: There is evidence that the result was not biased by missing outcome data “… with the analysis of measured values considered to be a sensitivity analysis.”

Selection of the Reported Results
Low Risk

Low risk Note: Registration with the protocol.

Deviations from Intended Observations
Low Risk

Low risk Note: This is a double-masked study and “modified intent-to-treat (mITT) analyses were conducted across outcomes.”

Measurement of the Outcome
Low Risk

Low risk Note: This is a double-masked study and “An independent, masked, imaging center reviewed and graded all images.”

Overall
High Risk

High risk

Categories: Dry AMD Geographic Atrophy