METformin for the MINimization of Geographic Atrophy Progression (METforMIN): A Randomized Trial

NCT02684578  |  METforMIN  |  Shen et al. (2024)

Shen, L. L., Keenan, J. D., Chahal, N., Taha, A. T., Saroya, J., Ma, C. J., Sun, M., Yang, D., Psaras, C., Callander, J., Flaxel, C., Fawzi, A. A., Schlesinger, T. K., Wong, R. W., Leung, L. S. B., Eaton, A. M., Steinle, N. C., Telander, D. G., Afshar, A. R., Neuwelt, M. D., Lim, J. I., Yiu, G. C., Stewart, J. M. METformin for the MINimization of Geographic Atrophy Progression (METforMIN): A Randomized Trial. Ophthalmology Science, 2024; 4:100440.

Locations

Locations

12 clinical centers in the United States

Study Period

Study Period

October 2016 to August 2021

Study Design

Study Design

Phase 2, randomized, multicenter, parallel-group trial

Study Population

Study Population

Characteristic:
Type of AMD:
1 (Dry AMD)
AMD Stage:
3 (Late)
Total Sample Size:
66 randomized (Metformin: 32, Observation: 34)
Age:
Phase 2, randomized, multicenter, parallel-group trial
Sex (Male) n%:
Not reported

Experimental Group

Intervention Therapy:
Metformin 2000 mg daily
Dose & Frequency:
500 mg once daily for one week, 500 mg twice daily for the second week, then 1000 mg twice daily for 18 months.
Age (Years):
78.5±10.9
Number of Patients:
32
Male N %:
13 (40.6%)
Patients Followed Up:
21

Control Group

Intervention Therapy:
Observation (no metformin treatment)
Dose & Frequency:
No intervention
Age (Years):
79.3±7.3
Number of Patients:
34
Male N %:
15 (44.1%)
Patients Followed Up:
23

Follow-up Time:  The median follow-up duration was 13.9 and 12.6 months in the observation and metformin groups, respectively.

Outcomes

Outcomes

Durability

N/A

Vision

Best-Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA)
The decline from baseline to 18 months:
• Metformin: -3.4 ± 1.1 letters/year
• Observation: -4.8 ± 1.7 letters/year
• Difference = 1.2 letters/year (95% CI: -5.1 to 2.7, p = 0.56).
Low Luminance Visual Acuity (LLVA)
The decline from baseline to 18 months:
• Metformin: -0.8 ± 2.2 letters/year
• Observation: -7.3 ± 2.5 letters/year
• Difference = 6.5 letters/year (95% CI: -0.1 to 13.2, p = 0.06).

Other

Efficacy: Progression
Annualized Growth Rate of Square Root-Transformed GA Area The change from baseline to 18 months (Primary Outcome):
• Metformin: 0.42 ± 0.04 mm/year
• Observation: 0.35 ± 0.04 mm/year
• Difference = 0.07 mm/year (95% CI: -0.05 to 0.18, p = 0.26).

Immunognicity

Not reported

Pharmokinetics

Not reported

Anatomic

Not reported

Safety

Treatment-emergent AEs (TEAEs)
14 participants in the metformin group experienced adverse events.
Most Common AEs
• Gastrointestinal side effects (diarrhea): 6 cases
• GI discomfort: 4 cases
• Nausea: 2 cases
• Vomiting: 1 case
• Constipation: 1 case
• Abdominal swelling: 1 case
• Lethargy: 4 cases
• Dizziness: 2 cases.
Serious Adverse Events Three participants (ascending thoracic aortic aneurysm, acute kidney injury, hepatic fibrosis), none attributed to metformin.

Outcomes

Conclusion

The trial did not support a significant effect of metformin in reducing GA progression. Further placebo-controlled trials may be needed to assess its potential role in AMD treatment.

Risk of Bias Assessment for Primary Outcome

Randomization Process
Low Risk

Low risk

Note: “We randomly assigned participants in a 1:1 ratio to observation or 18 months of 1000 mg oral metformin hydrochloride twice daily. A research coordinator generated the random allocation sequence stratified by clinical site but without other restrictions.” In addition, “Baseline demographics, medical conditions, and ocular characteristics were generally comparable between the observation and metformin groups.”

Missing Outcome Data

Some Concerns

Note: The withdrawal of both groups was very high (>30%) without information of the reasons. However, there is evidence that the result was not biased by missing outcome data (appropriate analysis models were applied to correct for bias).

Selection of the Reported Results
Low Risk

Low risk Note: registration with the protocol.

Deviations from Intended Observations
Concern Alert

Some concerns Note: Patients were aware of the treatment and there is no information on if there were deviations that arose because of the trial context. However, the deviations are balanced between the groups (Figure 1). ITT principle was applied for the data analysis.

Measurement of the Outcome
Low Risk

Low risk Note: “Each FAF image was graded by 2 independent graders masked to treatment allocation using the Heidelberg Eye Explorer software…”

Overall
Concern Alert

Some concerns

Categories: Dry AMD Geographic Atrophy