Seven-year outcomes following intensive anti-vascular endothelial growth factor therapy in patients with exudative age-related macular degeneration

• VIEW 2 Trial: NCT00637377 • Long-term follow-up: NCT05678517  |  VIEW 2  |  Lukacs R et al. (2023)

Lukacs R, Schneider M, Nagy ZZ, Sandor GL, et al. Seven-year outcomes following intensive anti-vascular endothelial growth factor therapy in patients with exudative age-related macular degeneration. BMC Ophthalmology, 2023; 23:110.

Locations

Locations

Two clinical trial sites in Hungary

Study Period

Study Period

Initial trial: 2008-2010; Long-term follow-up: 7 years (mean 82 ± 5 months follow-up)

Study Design

Study Design

Retrospective observational follow-up of a Phase 3 RCT

Study Population

Study Population

Characteristic:
Type of AMD:
2 (Wet AMD)
AMD Stage:
3 (Late)
Total Sample Size:
47 patients (47 eyes)
Age:
Retrospective observational follow-up of a Phase 3 RCT
Sex (Male) n%:
16 (34%)

Experimental Group

Intervention Therapy:
Intravitreal aflibercept 2 mg or ranibizumab 0.5 mg
Dose & Frequency:
Initial VIEW 2 regimen: monthly injections for 1 year, followed by as-needed (PRN) injections for 1 year.
Age (Years):
Not explicitly reported for each group
Number of Patients:
33 (aflibercept group), 14 (ranibizumab group)
Male N %:
Not explicitly reported for each group
Patients Followed Up:
47 (all patients completed follow-up)

Control Group

Intervention Therapy:
Not applicable (comparison between aflibercept and ranibizumab)
Dose & Frequency:
Same anti-VEGF protocol as experimental group
Age (Years):
Not explicitly reported for each group
Number of Patients:
33 (aflibercept group), 14 (ranibizumab group)
Male N %:
Not explicitly reported for each group
Patients Followed Up:
47 (all patients completed follow-up)

Follow-up Time:  Mean = 82 ± 5 months

Outcomes

Outcomes

Durability

Number of the Injections Mean number of injections was during the intensive phase:
• All: 17.8±3.0
Mean number of injections was during the the entire follow-up:
• All: 19.5±5.0
During the post-intensive phase:
• All: 14 of 47 eyes (30%) were given additional injections
• Mean number of 5.7±4.5
• Remaining 70% received no injections

Vision

Best-Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA)
The mean ±SD BCVA change from baseline to end of follow-up (Primary Outcome):
• All patients: -19 ± 23 letters (p < 0.001)
• Aflibercept: -18 ± 22 letters (p < 0.001)
• Ranibizumab: -23 ± 24 letters (p = 0.03)

The mean ±SD BCVA (letters) at baseline → end of intensive phase → end of follow-up:
• All patients: 54 ± 13 → 65 ± 17 → 45 ± 25 letters
• Aflibercept: 55 ± 13 → 65 ± 17 → 47 ± 25 letters
• Ranibizumab: 54 ± 13 → 64 ± 18 → 41 ± 25 letters.
Vision Maintaining
Proportion of patients with BCVA stability/improvement from baseline to end of follow-up:
• All patients: 55%
• Aflibercept: 60%
• Ranibizumab: 43%

Proportion of patients losing ≥10 ETDRS letters from baseline to end of follow-up:
• All patients: 45%
• Aflibercept: 40%
• Ranibizumab: 57%

Other

Efficacy: Progression Outcomes Geographic Atrophy (GA) The GA prevalence at end of follow-up:
• All patients: 96%

The mean ± SD change in GA area from baseline to the end of follow-up:
• All Patients: 7.22 ± 6.31 mm²
• Aflibercept: 6.89 ± 6.31 mm²
• Ranibizumab: 8.00 ± 6.48 mm²
• Difference: p= 0.47

Immunognicity

Not reported

Pharmokinetics

Not reported

Anatomic

Retinal Fluid Fluid on OCT at end of follow-up
• All patients: 15%
• Among untreated patients in the post-trial phase: 6%.

Safety

Ocular AE
• 8 eyes (17%) required cataract surgery.

Serious AEs
• No serious ocular AEs
• 2 patients experienced stroke during the 7-year follow-up

Outcomes

Conclusion

After 7 years of follow-up, aflibercept and ranibizumab demonstrated long-term stability or improvement in BCVA in about half of the patients. However, significant BCVA decline occurred in 45% of eyes, emphasizing the need for extended follow-up and potentially more intensive long-term therapy.

Risk of Bias Assessment for Primary Outcome

Randomization Process
Concern Alert

Some concerns

Note: No information on concealment and randomization. This is a long-term follow-up study from a part of a previously conducted RCT.
No information on if the baseline characteristics are balanced or not between the included two groups.

Missing Outcome Data
Low Risk

Low risk

Note: The present study included those who have follow-up information. No missingness related for the analysis.

Selection of the Reported Results
Low Risk

Low risk Note: registration with protocol.

Deviations from Intended Observations
Low Risk

Low risk Note: The original RCT was a double-masked study. The analysis based on all patients included.

Measurement of the Outcome
Concern Alert

Some concerns Note: no information on measurement quality guarantee. In addition, no information on masking. However, the measure was unlikely influenced by the acknowledgement of the intervention.

Overall
Concern Alert

Some concerns

Categories: Geographic Atrophy Wet AMD